Brand new survey consisted of step 3 bits. Region I incorporated questions regarding socio-market studies (decades, number of degree, parity, familial earnings, career, newest relationship reputation, sexual hobby, history of HPV vaccination, and you can reputation of unusual cervical disease assessment).
Part II comprised of six questions relating to the goal ladies who would be processed, many years to start, volume, decades otherwise requirements to eliminate of evaluating, and methods from tests. Precisely the professionals that has heard out-of HPV create go-ahead in order to Part III and that reviewed understanding of HPV of the kind of (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), form out-of alert and you may protection.
Before the studies, new questionnaire out-of area II and you will area III inside Thai type was basically contemplated, talked about, and you can changed up until opinion certainly one of 20 researchers who were the gynecologic oncologists (particular was people in other synchronous training). The professionals rated each of 19 inquiries since the often ‘relevant’ or ‘not relevant’. The thing-top Blogs Authenticity Index (I-CVI) is actually computed for every single goods, therefore the Articles Validity Directory (CVI) is calculated by firmly taking the typical ratio off 14 questions relating to understanding of cervical cancers examination and you https://getbride.org/da/portugisiske-kvinder/ can 5 questions regarding HPV. The fresh CVI was step one for both areas of the fresh survey (S1 Table). The precision is checked-out for the 31 feminine with similar characteristic given that members. Brand new Cronbach’ alpha coefficients towards the accuracy was indeed 0.819 to possess knowledge about cervical cancers evaluating and you will 0.907 to possess understanding of HPV.
Analysis collection
Towards date of planned colposcopy, the research secretary considering advice of investigation toward women just who came across introduction conditions. The women which provided to participate gave written informed agree and you will responded the fresh questionnaire independently on their own before continuing to help you colposcopy.
Study collected because of it data were socio-demographic analysis (Area We of the survey), experience with cervical cancer evaluating (Part II), and you will knowledge of HPV (Region III).
Analytical data
The brand new answers of knowledge on cervical cancers evaluation and HPV was indeed reviewed by the for each items in advance of scoring categorization. Right respond to is obtained once the step 1 while ‘incorrect and you will being unsure of answer’ try obtained 0.
Away from fourteen inquiries regarding cervical cancer tests, feminine whoever rating was ? 10 had been randomly classified since with ‘a great knowledge’ usually have been thought to be with “unhealthy degree”. Getting experience with HPV, women whose respond to was ‘never ever been aware of HPV’ was basically excluded regarding analysis out of HPV education.
Out-of 5 questions, feminine whose get was indeed ? 3 was in fact considered as which have ‘good knowledge of HPV’ or else since the ‘not-good knowledge’. From 19 issues, female whoever score was indeed ? thirteen were classified once the that have ‘good full knowledge’ otherwise just like the ‘not-good full knowledge’.
The study were obtained when you look at the an electronic digital databases and you may assessed playing with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Detailed statistics were utilized to research group study and you may was described once the number which have payment, mean which have practical departure or average that have range. Brand new organization ranging from for each changeable and you can studies rating was indeed analyzed using easy linear regression. Exploratory design is made inside the multivariable study in addition to most of the details potentially linked to the content rating. The fresh noticed number of analytical significance are an excellent p-property value 0.05 otherwise less.
Abilities
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>